Right to be Forgotten Meaning – Every thing Deep Explain


On May 25, 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force. Every company dealing with personal data must comply with this new European regulation or face fines and other penalties.

Companies have scrambled to prepare for the Right to be forgotten GDPR, which is one of the GDPR’s important new rules. This article will explain everything you need to know about the RTBF, including its definition, possible applications, and how it should be implemented under GDPR guidelines.

The Right to be Forgotten Meaning

This Right is particularly relevant in the digital age, where our online activities can leave behind a trail of sensitive information. The Right to be forgotten can help protect our privacy and prevent our data from being used against us.

However, the Right to be forgotten is not absolute. There are certain circumstances where the public interest may override an individual’s Right to privacy. For example, if someone has been convicted of a crime, their criminal record may not be erased even if they request it.

The Right to be forgotten is still a relatively new concept, and courts are still grappling with how to apply it in practice. In 2014, the European Court of Justice ruled that Google must remove links to outdated or inaccurate information about an individual if they request it. This ruling has had a significant impact on how search engines deal with personal data.

If you’re concerned about your online privacy, the best thing you can do is stay informed about your rights and make sure you understand how your data is being used.

What is the Right to be forgotten in GDPR?

The Right to be Forgotten is a data protection concept that provides people with the right to have their personal information deleted under specific conditions. This Right is not absolute, and limitations exist, but it is a crucial component of GDPR.

When does the Right to be forgotten to apply?

The Right to be forgotten applies in certain circumstances, such as when information is inaccurate, irrelevant, or excessive. If you believe that your personal data falls into one of these categories, you can file a request for deletion with the data controller.

Right to be forgotten How does it work?

The Right to be Forgotten is a relatively new concept that is slowly gaining traction in the legal world. The basic idea behind the Right to be Forgotten is that individuals have the right to have their personal information removed from public records. This Right is not currently recognized in the United States, but some other countries, like France, have begun implementing it.

There is still a lot of debate surrounding the Right to be Forgotten and how it should be applied. Some argue that it goes too far and could be used to cover up important information. Others say that it doesn’t go far enough and that there should be more protection for people’s personal information.

Regardless of where you stand on the issue, the Right to be Forgotten is an important concept that is worth keeping an eye on. It will likely continue to evolve as we learn more about data privacy and what rights people should have regarding their personal information.

What are the exceptions to being de-listed?

There are a few exceptions to being de-listed under the “right to be forgotten” law. If the information in question is of public interest, is necessary for scientific or historical research, or is needed to protect someone’s life or property, it can remain online. Additionally, if the information has been previously published in a book or magazine, it may not be removed online.

If you are an individual looking for ways to take advantage of The Right To Be Forgotten. Or, if you run a business that wants to know how it can utilize The Right To Be Forgotten in its customer communications, there are a few exceptions that you should keep in mind. Individuals cannot ask businesses to remove information that has been published on government websites.

It means individuals cannot use The Right To Be Forgotten to get rid of any criminal records they have on file with local governments. In addition, private companies cannot request the removal of any information they have published on behalf of their clients; again, these requests must come from individuals only.

How can I request the deletion of personal data?

If you want to request the deletion of your data, you can fill out this form. We will process your data to be able to answer your inquiry or to complete our contract with you. We do not transfer your personal data outside the European Union (EU).

Who is responsible for notifying third parties, and how do they inform them?

The Right to be Forgotten is a concept gaining traction in recent years. This Right is not currently enshrined in law in most jurisdictions, but the European Union has taken steps to codify it.

There are several considerations to consider when exercising the Right to be Forgotten. One key question is who is responsible for notifying third parties about removing data? And how should they go about doing so?

Generally speaking, it is the responsibility of the individual. Who wants their data removed to notify any third parties who may be hosting it? It can be a difficult and time-consuming process, especially if many different websites are involved.

One option is to use Google’s “Remove content” tool. This tool allows individuals to request the removal of links to their personal data from Google’s search results. Google will then send notifications to the relevant websites, asking them to remove the links.

Another option is to contact the website or service directly and request that your data be removed. Maybe not always be successful, but it is worth a try.

It may also be possible to persuade the data controller to anonymity your personal data in some cases. Means that it would no longer be identifiable as being about you. For example, if you had records taken from a hospital database, it may be possible for them to remove any details that could identify you.

What happens if a request is refused?

If a request is refused, the individual can file a complaint with the supervisory authority. If the complaint is upheld, the data controller must comply with the ruling and delete the requested information. Data subjects must make their requests in writing. Although specific procedures may be required if the data controller keeps large amounts of sensitive data.

The request should also detail the purpose of the requested records and justify the request. The request should also specify whether or not a copy of the relevant documents or information is needed.

The GDPR clarifies that all communication between data controllers and individuals must be in an official language agreed by both parties. Data controllers must keep complete records of all requests received from individuals and details of how each one was handled. Data controllers can charge an administrative fee, but these fees cannot be excessive or disproportionate to the actual costs.


The right to be forgotten is recognized in Europe but not in the United States

The Right to be forgotten is a concept gaining ground in Europe but has not yet been recognized in the United States. This Right allows individuals to have specific information about them removed from the Internet if it is outdated, inaccurate, or simply no longer relevant.

There are several reasons why someone might want to have information removed from the Internet. In some cases, it may be because they have changed their name or made other significant changes in their life, and they no longer want old information associated with them. In other cases, it may be that the information in question is no longer accurate or relevant, and they don’t want it coming up when people search for them online.

Whatever the reason. The Right to be forgotten is an increasingly important concept as more and more of our lives move online. It will be interesting to see if and when the United States decides to recognize this Right.

The case against Google for invasion of privacy was dismissed

It was a case that made headlines around the world. A man appealed to Google for invasion of privacy after the search engine refused to remove links to old articles about his criminal past.

But, in a decision that Google and other search engines will welcome, the High Court has dismissed the man’s claim.

The ruling is a victory for those who argue that the so-called “right to be forgotten” does not extend to the Internet. It means that, in general, search engines are not obliged to remove links to accurate and publish articles in good faith.

The case was brought by a man who cannot be named for legal reasons. He argued that Google’s refusal to remove links to old newspaper articles about his conviction for fraud and subsequent jail sentence was a breach of his Right to privacy.

He said that as he had served his sentence and been rehabilitated. The continued publication of the articles was disproportionate and invaded his privacy.

However, the High Court found no evidence that Google had acted unlawfully. It also found that even if the man’s privacy had been invaded. It was outweighed by the public interest in having access to information about him.

According to the Circuit Court, forcing material removal from the Internet is unconstitutional under the First Amendment

A federal appeals court has ruled that an internet company cannot be forced to remove an article from its website at the request of an individual who objects to the article’s content.

The case was brought by an unnamed plaintiff in Florida. Involved a 2013 article published by Gannett Company, Inc.’s website FLORIDA TODAY. The article concerned the plaintiff’s arrest for driving under the influence.

The plaintiff asked FLORIDA TODAY to remove the article from its website. Citing a European Union law known as the “right to be forgotten.” This rule permits people to request that search engines remove links to websites that contain false. Irrelevant, or abusive information about them.

FLORIDA TODAY refused to remove the article, and the plaintiff sued, arguing that the company had violated his Right to be forgotten.


A lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering FLORIDA TODAY to take down the article. On appeal, however, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the original ruling. Finding that requiring the removal of the item would violate the First Amendment.

The First Amendment does not allow courts to order speakers to take down lawful speech just because someone demands it, Judge William H. Pryor Jr. wrote in the opinion. Florida Today’s article was not a violation of Petitioner’s rights, and he bore the burden to show that it was. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and press freedom, said David Horowitz, chief counsel at Freedom Center of Missouri.

He adds that that includes the Right to publish stories that others would prefer to be forgotten. This lawsuit was meritless, and I’m glad that this ruling affirmed our client’s First Amendment rights.

Court victory

Yet another court victory for free speech against censorship by social media platforms. And other organizations who think they should decide what you see on the Internet. In April 2018, Google deleted a blog post from its platform after demands from the French government.

Forcing the press to suppress accurate information would violate press freedom laws.

The Right to be forgotten is often misunderstood. Some people think it means that they can have any information about them removed from the Internet. But that’s not what it means. For example, the Right to be forgotten does not apply if the information in question is true and accurate or if it is in the public interest.

This principle has been enshrined in European law since 2014 when the European Court of Justice ruled that individuals had the Right to have their data removed from Google’s search results if that data was “inaccurate, irrelevant or excessive”. Since then, there have been several high-profile cases where people have tried to use the Right to be forgotten to have information about them removed from the Internet.

Pros & Cons of Right to Be Forgotten GDPR

• As a solid response to privacy concerns, governments across Europe have introduced GDPR. It is applicable in all EU member states from May 25, 2018.
• The primary purpose of introducing regulation is to protect individuals and their data from cyber-attacks. By giving them a right over their personal data. Such as knowledge of where data is stored, who has access, etc.

The Right to be forgotten has its cons.

• Taking down content from a web page may require you to remove all your content from that page.
• In addition, many experts believe such an act is almost impossible because once something is published online. It is nearly impossible for someone else not to republish it in some form or another.

• This can mean losing some of your links or losing a spot on a search engine’s results page.


The Right to be forgotten is an essential part of The General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. It allows individuals to demand that their data be deleted from a company’s records. In most cases, this will only apply when they no longer want personal information on record with that company. It should not affect how you handle other accounts linked to them.

It’s also worth noting that you should not remove information just because someone asks you. However, if someone requests that, we delete personal data. Right to be forgotten UK google must respond within one month in writing and either tell them yes or no and explain why in both instances.

Scroll to Top